History of VemsFrontier/ArmUfo
Older Newer
2006-03-16 04:43:08 . . . . MembersPage/JorgenKarlsson [Updated specification]
2006-03-16 04:43:08 . . . . MembersPage/MarcellGal [output updates]
2006-03-16 04:43:08 . . . . MembersPage/MarcellGal [outputs updated]
2006-03-16 04:43:08 . . . . MembersPage/MarcellGal [output update]
2006-03-16 04:43:08 . . . . MembersPage/MarcellGal [updated output specs]
2006-03-16 04:43:08 . . . . ip70-185-182-238.sb.sd.cox.net [Modify the specification list to be more formal.]
2006-03-16 04:43:08 . . . . MembersPage/JörgenKarlsson [Added 2 ign and cleaned out old ArmUfo information]
2006-03-16 04:43:08 . . . . MembersPage/JörgenKarlsson [Added 2 more ignition ouputs]
2006-03-16 04:43:08 . . . . MembersPage/MarcellGal [mostly agreed, but somewhere not]
2006-03-16 04:43:08 . . . . 1-1-1-39a.gam.gbg.bostream.se [Added new specification for this board.]
2006-03-16 04:43:08 . . . . MembersPage/MarcellGal [Jorgen, good job on apps and spec]


Changes by last author:

Changed:
ARM based Unidentified Fueling Object - developer info!
ARMUfo - developer info!
Changed:
The primary application for this board has changed as a result of the ArmEfi growing out of the EC36 connector and the box. The ArmUfo will use the 120X40X2.5mm box and the EC36 connector instead, while the ArmEfi is postponed until we find suitable connector and box.
The primary application for this board has changed, ARMUfo is now a standalone CDI ignition with ION processing capabilities.
Added:
4-8 CDI ignition outputs with multispark capability.
Changed:

AND

11..13 (likely 12) DPAK outputs sound right (including WBO2 heater).

* all of them are flyback capable, except 2..3:

** 1 FET for WBO2 heater

** 1..2 HV IGBT output that can drive relay or small solenoid

* flyback for max 3 can be throughole (or simple SMB diode)

8 channels that are capable of controlled flyback (with PNP darlington DPAK)

* exactly 8 DPAK outputs can be high-freq PWM-ed (64usec, for injectors). The rest can be soft-PWM-ed, like 30 Hz for boost solenoid

* and 5 DPAK outputs can be IGBT HV (for ignition coil). 6 might be possible, but 5 is important.

As you see (8+5=13), so either we have

* 13 DPAK-s

* or 12 DPAKs, but than 1 channel is hibrid: HV capable with optional controlled flyback (not populated in certain configurations)

optionally - likely DROPPED: 1 lowside driver with 350mA rating, limited to fuel pump relay or small solenoid SOT23 NPN should be fine. protection:

* Some flyback gizmo (BAW56?)

* something that can handle the current with some margin, having a polyswitch to protect it would be nice.

This is a space-saving thing, so the 350mA driver can be left off if(DPAK>=12) => so the 16 EC36 output pins (this includes stepper) cannot decrease. Makes little sense, an IGBT without flyback should be better for almost same footprint

Usage

* For a V8, a CDI board would be used or injection would be 4 banks and 4 ign outputs for wasted spark.

* For a I5, 5 inj + 5 ign + 1 WBO2 + 0..2 outputs for other stuff (boostcontrol, etc...) This is the most demanding configuration that is likely to be supported by the limited EC36 pincount

* For an I6, 6 inj + 3 ign with wasted spark

Note that above setups would use boards populated different way: differentiated at PNP-time.

----

Case relevant issues

It is very important to have IO buttons (how many?) on the box, having a keyboard in the car at all times is not practical. This also makes it possible to make a compact hand held tuner that can tune the ArmEfi and other VEMS frontier products. I guess it is the question of a free digital or analog input(s), and the rest is mechanical (case) issue.

MMC slot ?

* I think the MMC can live inside, without the possibility of removing (maybe soldered)

* anyone insisting on removable MMC slot ?

----

This (armufo??) is a multi application board, it can be used for the following applications:

With (external ?) display and buttons:

* MAF replacement / MAF tuner.

* WBo2 Lambda meter (? why would someone use this instead of a standalone? maybe this is ment logger box with internal WBO2 controller )

* Boost controller.

* Exhaust temp meter.

* Additional fuel controller.

* Handheld tuner for ArmEfi and the other CAN enabled boards. I highly doubt that this would work. A logger and control board can be merged reasonably. A UI (user-interface) board cannot. (well, apexi makes profit from boost controllers made this way, but separated UI and controller is remarkably better).

* Entry level engine management system with integrated display (how?) and user interface.

Maybe 2-4 simple injector outputs if there is room. This will be the first to go when we run out of space.