MembersPage/MarcellGal/PowerAndTraction/InputTrigger (2007-05-10 23:49:44)

Trigger related subpage of MembersPage/MarcellGal/PowerAndTraction

There is still some uncertainty about which sensor position is which.

They mounted the engine (apparently properly ;-) but ... the 2 sensors were in a box. The 2 sensors

We might have to scope it anyway, to verify crankhome polarity and HALL window position.

Found some metric (M6?) screws, used a washer and an extra female to make it proper length, and mounted sensors in the 2 holes close to each other.

Teppo said:

That is, with normal mounting. I will have to check (and document) if I followed the standard (colors: no other difference between sensors), or got it with colors swapped.


Cam-HALL sensor

There are 2(-3) possible cam-HALL setups, with exactly the same function.

I found that ...

Conclusion: either the connector tricked us badly, or my HALL sensor is bad.

1.1.23 allowed running without HALL (with bad starting: every 2nd attempt on average). The factory motronic setup continues to run if HALL sensor is disconnected after startup. But 1.1.23 also allows to start up the engine (with 50% chance) and good running (without retard: retard makes little sense when only HALL is faulty, since timing is done from crank anyway). This does not effect normal operation, the same code runs perfectly when there is proper HALL signal, of course.


Spare HALL sensor

I verified that my spare HALL sensor works (from the audi distributer with the slightly bent shaft)

But I don't know if such a spare sensor makes things easier. Not a bolt-out, bolt-in thing.

Although I have the spare sensor in the distributer with bent shaft, a small HALL sensor, and 1GT101 sensor too, it seems difficult to mount it in a sane way (either on front side wheel or inside distributer). Had the front-side wheel have 5 (or 7 or any odd number would work) spokes, instead of 6, that would make it easier to watch those with a 1GT101 HALL sensor.


Useful links