History of MembersPage/GergelyLezsak/InjectorMeasurement
Older Newer
2007-04-04 15:26:50 . . . . 214-241.dyn-fa.pool.ew.hu [New inj measurements and guesses]
2007-02-09 00:42:47 . . . . BengtR [Ignition advance settings par duty cycle speculation.]
2007-02-05 17:37:16 . . . . MembersPage/GergelyLezsak [new flow measurements]
2007-01-27 12:07:13 . . . . BengtR [Succestion for measuring true injector opening pulse width]
2007-01-26 18:22:08 . . . . MembersPage/MarcellGal [pw notes]
2007-01-26 12:46:39 . . . . 63.115.207.35 [first flow measurement values]
2007-01-26 01:34:00 . . . . BengtR [Flow rate measuring succestion]
2007-01-24 17:17:14 . . . . MembersPage/MarcellGal [flowbench hint: cranking RPM]
2007-01-23 10:34:44 . . . . 63.115.207.35 [How to force fixed inj pulsewidth?]
2007-01-13 16:00:48 . . . . MembersPage/GergelyLezsak [New injector opening/closing test measurements page]


Changes by last author:

Added:
NEWS 2007.04.04

I've done a measurement of a full set of six (Holley) 55lbs injectors (mentioned earlier also).

Here's the flow comparison chart.

comparison.gif

Changed:
NEWS 2007.02.05
Full details in XLS here: http://quasar.dynaweb.hu/~lezsi/vems/holleyX6.xls

Higher-than-spec flow values in low pw measurements are probably caused by slow closing time. (So f.e. at 1ms the injector was open for ~1.5ms instead of 1ms which was the base of calculation)

I'm not sure is it good or bad. How it will affect idle quality?

For example at 1.2ms it would be 15% difference in flow between the slowest and the fastest injectors, that means lambda value of 0.92 for one cyl. and 1.07 for the other (biased at 1), which is usually quite a big difference...

----

2007.02.05

Changed:
***it's a bit more stable now, at ~1100 rpm idle which seems a bit high (for 6 cyl!), but injectors like it and luckily it's not a daily driver...-maybe it's inj. deviance @ low pw..