History of MembersPage/ErikEnglund/FirmwareWishes
Older Newer
2012-02-12 10:47:53 . . . . 62-101-48-216.sheab.net [Fuelpressure safety fuelcut]
2011-06-04 22:16:11 . . . . 87.226.1.232 [New Idle Control suggestion with Picture...answer]
2011-06-04 22:03:54 . . . . 87.226.1.232 [[New Idle Control suggestion with Picture...answer]
2011-06-02 23:19:18 . . . . 62-101-48-234.sheab.net [New Idle Control suggestion with Picture of table]
2011-03-08 07:04:54 . . . . proxy35.netz.sbs.de [Explanation]
2011-03-07 23:24:38 . . . . 4d6f4e11.adsl.enternet.hu [for pump-off vemscfg needed]
2011-03-07 12:36:39 . . . . proxy32.netz.sbs.de [Added wish for PWM-Fuelpump]


Changes by last author:

Changed:
* PWM-Controlled fuelpump-output.

** Be able to choose the Secondary PWM-Output for fuelpump use.

** good idea

Fuelcut (and sparkcut?) when pressure differential between MAP and FuelPressure is too large (using pure fuelpressure sensor or a differential sensor).

Right now it can be configured using the Warning light function and relay for cutting injector relay, a very ugly way of solving this problem.

Deleted:

* Not able to use "Pump off after activity" at the moment.

** why not ? use [VT error reporting for this] - so we can reproduce the setup with your vemscfg

*** Its just when using Secondary pwm-output for Fuelpump. Bad formulation from my side, sorry. It´s why i wish to implent it as a fw-function.

Using a FP of this type: http://www.mrm-racing.se/index.php?pageid=fuelab_pumpe

Not high priority

-----

New Idle Control settings suggestion.

.

Life would be much easier if the refDC menu was like this:

idle1.JPG

Use this and set low PID values as standard, allowing it only to lower the refdc with 1-2% per second. I think it will give rock solid idle control and much easier to setup without oscilations.

The ECU knows exactly which refdc to target all the time.

This plus a second table for compensating refDC% against coolantTemp.

User defined refDC addition when starting coolant fan which sometimes draws lots of current.

What do you think?

GintsK: I think (from experience) such table is unusable. 55% DC can be 700 or 1700rpm as well on same engine depending on oil temperature, air temperature, ignition advance, lambda, electrical loads... So no sense. Current system is good in most cases. I never spend more than 10...15minutes for achieving really good results.

Some load prediction input is another story. This is welcome!