###      
 #####   
 ##  ##  
 ##  ##  
 ##  ##  
 ##  ##  
######   
         

 _______ 
(  ____ )
| (    )|
| (____)|
|     __)
| (\ (   
| ) \ \__
|/   \__/
         

         
         
 #    #  
 #    #  
 #    #  
  #  #   
   ##    
         

 __          __
 \ \        / /
  \ \  /\  / / 
   \ \/  \/ /  
    \  /\  /   
     \/  \/    
               
               

         
         
 # ###   
 ##   #  
 ##   #  
 # ###   
 #       
 #       

IMPORTANT: enter the case-INsensitive alphabetic (no numbers) code AND WRITE SOME SHORT summary of changes (below) if you are saving changes. (not required for previewing changes). Wiki-spamming is not tolerated, will be removed, so it does NOT even show up in history. Spammers go away now.


Visit Preferences to set your user name
Summary of change:
Fero reported that '''Double VANOS works perfectly''' * it '''follows the target cam position perfectly''' * it is actually easier to set up than the PWM type actuator (eg. suzuki) * but high-side driver was required (so the protection-diode need not be removed from the solenoid-connector) ** a 4-channel low-Z-extension board was modified (4 tracecuts) to act as high-side PFET driver. Using 10k Rgs resistor, and driven from p259 (or other) outputs (p259/0,p259/1 and p259/6,p259/7, remember: pairs must be neighbors), with 510 Ohm. ** high-side driver is also required for Honda, where the solenoid has 1 pin grounded to the body '''Information needs some cleanup from''' * MembersPage/GunnarReynisson/VariableVanos * MembersPage/JasonVoytilla/BMW/Vanos especially trigger setup and initial cam-position target tables. ---- The intake VR polarity was originally wrong (rising edge) * interestingly, the intake actuation worked that way too. After swapping the intake-cam VR polarity (LM1815 likes VR falling edge on its input): http://www.vems.hu/files/Fero/BMW_M3/BMW_S52_doubleVanos_correctIntakePolarity.png Note that * '''exhaust-cam''' (which is 6+1 pulse) is connected to '''secondary trigger, the +1 pulse is toothcount=2''' * '''intake-cam''' (6 evenly placed pulse every 120 crankdeg, tooth_cnt=4,24,44,...) is connected to '''third cam''' (therefore "exhaust target" table is relevant for intake). ** Originally 1 pulse was inside the missing-gap, so this is different: implementation needs change, at least the configlet (possibly some other change needed, like separate "measure tooth" parameter for sectrig and third trig ?) ---- From engine-recorded ~1190 RPM triggerlog, Marcell extracted a 16 second section: http://www.vems.hu/files/Fero/BMW_M3/BMW_doubleVanos_correctIntakePolarity_nicePart.zip * this, speeded up ("600%" and "700" percent in audacity) 7 and 8 times respectively, played in endless-loop, '''triggered v3 perfectly on the bench (~8400 and ~9600 RPM respectively), including sectrig position measurement''' (3d trigger was not saved into the stereo wav by VemsTune triggerlog dialog), with '''no trigger-errors or RPM dropouts at all'''. ** something is not right around the exhaust VR of the actual engine, because RPM occasionally drops to 0 around 6500 RPM. Maybe amplitude is too high ? (around +-6V at 1200 RPM, likely amplitude more than +-30V at high RPM). This is regardless of the intake cam (third trigger enabled/disabled), but problem disappears with only primary trigger (but that's not an acceptable solution as COP coils and VVTI requires camsync) ** we'll prolly need some code modification to only send the missing tooth primtrig (not all 58 teeth) so we see all relevant events in 115200 baud triggerlog upto 9000+ RPM. That should reveal what is happening in the actual engine: extra noise-pulse (seems most likely) or missing exhaust-pulse
Optional: Add document to category:
Wiki formatting: * is Bullet list ** Bullet list subentry ... '''Bold''', ---- is horizontal ruler, <code> preformatted text... </code> See wiki editing HELP for tables and other formatting tips and tricks.